Anti-National Anarchy
THUGLAK - Editorial 28-10-2026
Anti-National Anarchy
The continuous anarchy being perpetrated since October 11 by the "cockroaches" and Rahul's I.N.D.I. Alliance parties—openly talking about removing the Modi government from power through violence—has strayed from being merely against the Modi government. Instead, it has turned against all constitutional, administrative, and judicial bodies including Parliament, the Election Commission, and even the Supreme Court. This is not just a major challenge to democracy; it is anti-national anarchy. The fact that key leaders of the protest have openly stated their objective is to bring about a regime change like in Bangladesh through anarchy, violence, and bloodshed clearly proves that their effort is to overthrow the Constitution and bring about a regime change through revolution. There is no doubt that this foolish attempt will certainly fail; nevertheless, it is our duty to explain it in detail.
Peace Among 160 Crore People Across 24 Lakh Sq. Km.!
Anarchy by 10,000 People Within 4 Sq. Km. in Delhi!
In our nation spanning 24 lakh square kilometers, peace prevails as usual among 160 crore people. However, within a narrow 3–4 square kilometer area in Delhi, the opposition—specifically driven by Rahul—has targeted the lifelines of the political structure: central government offices, Parliament, the Election Commission, and the Supreme Court. This protest did not even resonate significantly in states ruled by the Congress or opposition parties. In Karnataka, the Congress government itself suppressed the protest conducted by Congress against the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC). In Kerala, a funny situation occurred where Left leaders attacked Congressmen protesting against the CEC, leading the Congress government to arrest Left leaders. In Punjab, AAP and Congress clashed with each other. Neither in BJP-ruled states nor in opposition-ruled states did any demonstrations or anarchy take place like in Delhi. Even the "cockroaches" could not pull off a rally this time like the one they conducted in Delhi last July. Why? During the July protest, resentment among lakhs of families due to the cancellation of the NEET exam somewhat justified their protest. After that, as the "cockroaches" demanded consecutive resignations from the CEC, Modi, and Amit Shah, their image shifted from an apolitical youth movement to an arm of opposition parties. Consequently, not even a few thousand people joined their October 11 protest (including AAP and Communist cadres).
The anti-CEC drama orchestrated by Rahul and Priyanka on October 6 and 7 merely became visual content for news channels; even then, there was no massive crowd. Next, on October 12, the Congress lied that 2.5 lakh people participated in the rally led by the I.N.D.I. Alliance toward the Supreme Court, led by the brother-sister duo. However, we fed 16-second drone videos taken from multiple angles into AI ChatGPT and asked, "What is the crowd size?" It replied: "Based on the analysis of five overhead frames from the video, I estimate the gathering to be around 8,000 to 15,000 people; approximately 11,000 to 12,000." Thus, at the peak of the 3-day Rahul-Priyanka "revolution", only 10,000 people had gathered. The actual crowd was just 1/25th of the 2.5 lakh claimed by Congress. Why? The general consensus—and the reality—is that, unlike the anti-CAA protests, there is no emotional public support against S.I.R. (Special Inspection/Revision of electoral rolls).
Rahul Vs. Cockroaches to Rahul + Cockroaches
Initially framing his losses around anti-EVM fights and then alleged voter list discrepancies, Rahul had been speaking against S.I.R. Meanwhile, on October 3, the "cockroaches" began a demonstration in Mumbai demanding the CEC's resignation. Fearing they might steal the spotlight, Rahul and Priyanka, along with Akhilesh Yadav and over 200 Opposition MPs, hurriedly launched a march from Parliament on October 6 to meet the Election Commission. When Delhi Police denied permission for them to go without EC authorization, the rally was blocked. Rahul and Priyanka then trespassed upon Akashvani Bhavan, laying siege until midnight for 9 hours, turning it into global TV news.
After the first anti-EC "revolution" failed, Rahul met President Droupadi Murmu on October 9 to allege S.I.R. vote theft. That too became global TV news. On October 12, Rahul announced that I.N.D.I. Alliance leaders would meet Supreme Court judges to submit a petition against S.I.R. The Chief Justice issued a statement: "Anyone can file a writ petition in court. No one can meet the Chief Justice in a personal capacity." Consequently, Rahul launched his second "revolution," announcing a march to the Supreme Court. The movement took on a glamorous turn as female leaders like Priyanka, Sharad Pawar's daughter Supriya Sule, and several other women danced atop open vehicles. Crucially, Neha Arora—a young woman leader of the Left-wing CPI's All India Students' Federation—also participated.
Neha Arora’s sole qualification in Rahul’s Congress is her intense hatred for Modi, matching Rahul’s. News reports suggest that the prominence given to her by Rahul raised eyebrows among other alliance members. Her participation united Rahul, who stepped up as a competitor to the anarchic "cockroaches," with the "cockroaches" themselves. Without explicitly naming them, Rahul stated: "We are not separate. Our target, vision, and resistance are one. Restoring murdered democracy is our sole goal." Why did Neha Arora jump in there? Why are the "cockroaches" leaning toward Congress?
Weakened Cockroaches!
In short, support for the "cockroaches" has collapsed and weakened.
One reason the October 11 "cockroach" protest fizzled out was that leading figures arrested earlier—Abhijit Deepke, Sourav Das, and Ashutosh Ranga—secured bail by signing an undertaking in court promising not to engage in unlawful protests. That exposed them as cowards who could not bear even a single day of prison after experiencing 5-star hotel luxury.
Meanwhile, Delhi Police declared: "Protests will not be allowed at the narrow Jantar Mantar area located near Parliament, the EC, and the Supreme Court." Instead of that restricted spot, police designated three spacious alternative protest sites in Delhi. The "cockroaches," who had promised not to conduct illegal protests, gathered surreptitiously at Jantar Mantar. Police arrested them promptly. The court remanded them to 5-day custody. Wherever Abhijit Deepke is seen, members of the public chant slogans against him.
Thus, the era of the "cockroaches" has virtually come to an end. As stated in our editorial (Thuglak, 23.09.2026), our country's youth (Gen-Z) are responsible citizens, not anarchists; it is now proven that the "cockroaches" do not represent them.
Constitutional & Anti-National Anarchy!
Rahul, who suffered crushing defeats in 99 elections—including 73 out of 83 assembly elections and three parliamentary elections since 2014—attempted to blame fraud in everything from EVMs to S.I.R. Ultimately, his irresponsible politics targeting Modi expanded to drag constitutional bodies—the Election Commission, the President, and the Supreme Court—into his protest politics. (Box News 1 explains how baseless his allegations against the Election Commission are).
While the case regarding the Election Commission was pending, he led a march toward the Supreme Court and submitted a petition himself. Even before the court could initiate a hearing, he declared the very next day: "Whatever the court decides, we do not care. Our protest will continue."This statement shocked the nation, as well as parties within his own I.N.D.I. Alliance.
Having someone suspected of mental instability as an opposition leader poses a danger.. His actions reflect abnormality. Even while his party was in power, he famously tore up an ordinance his own government intended to pass. (Box News 2 highlights how peaceful the responsible opposition BJP's protests were compared to the anarchic protests led by Rahul).
Party members themselves often do not know where he is or where he is traveling. Rahul’s life, filled with secret trips, remains a mystery. Journalist Saeed Naqvi, close to the Sonia family, stated in 2005 that Rahul suffers from mental illness and is unfit to lead the Congress party. The US Government recorded this statement, which was exposed via WikiLeaks in 2014 (1).
Responsible Congress leaders such as Digvijaya Singh, Ghulam Nabi Azad, Pranab Mukherjee, and even former US President Barack Obama have broadly concurred with this assessment. (We will write about this in detail later).
Our opposition parties and global adversaries know that Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is central to our nation’s rise, cannot be defeated. Their objective is to project widespread internal opposition, diminish his prestige, and stall India's rise. (Box News 3 details how influential global bodies, media outlets, and foreign funds support this effort).
Ultimately, the Congress led by Rahul is no longer a political party, and he is no longer an opposition leader; he has become an anarchist. Hatred demanding Modi's downfall at any cost—even if the nation is ruined—has blinded him. Only God can save him and the Congress trapped in his hands.
(1) WikiLeaks: US Embassy's Secret Report on Rahul Gandhi (3 March 2005)